The analysis showed there were no significant differences between male and female coaches in overall leadership behaviors. It would have also been possible to actually go to individual Quantitative research article critique and meet with the coaches as a group to administer surveys.
While this is a good sample size, the problem lies with the distribution of the sample.
Junior high coaches were significantly lower in training and instruction than either high school or college coaches. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. The numerous potential threats to internal validity need to be addressed and minimized where possible.
With regard to coaching level, 25 0.
Investigating leadership, gender, and coaching level using the Revised Leadership for Sport Scale. Within the sample, 0. This method would have given a good cross-section of gender and coaching experience for a variety of sports.
Junior high coaches also demonstrated a lesser degree of social support than either the high school or college coaches. The socioeconomics and population of the school itself could play a factor.
If the program has had several losing seasons in a row, perhaps the attitude of the coach could be different than that of a coach who has recently won a state title. The sample was nonrandom, including coaches that were chosen on a volunteer basis.
The purpose of the study was to determine possible differences in leadership behaviors, using the Revised Leadership for Sport Scale RLSSbetween male and female coaches and among different coaching levels. There are a number of other factors that could effect the internal validity of the study, yet were not addressed by the researchers.
Because there are few published examples of critique examples, this article provides the practical points of conducting a formally written quantitative research article critique while providing a brief example to demonstrate the principles and form.
A MANOVA was used to analyze the data for differences between male and female coaches with regard to leadership behaviors. A MANOVA was also used to examine the data for differences between the three levels of coaching junior high, high school, and college with regard to leadership behavior in general.
The results indicated no significant interactions. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4. The first hypothesis was that male and female coaches would respond differently to the RLSS in overall leadership behaviors. This could present a threat to the internal validity in that participants might not have been entirely focused on completing the scale, but instead on coordinating practice, completing paperwork, etc.
Coaching experience would greatly effect the responses of the participants, yet this was not considered in the study. Once again, a better analysis method could have been chosen based on the nature of the data collected.1 Quantitative Article Critique: Factors Affecting the Successful Employment of Transition-Age Youths with Visual Impairments Introduction This article examined some of the issues that affect youths with visual impairments as.
This article presents a framework nurses can use to read and critique a research article.
In a quantitative study, the significance of the statistical tests is important. Checklist for reading and critiquing a research article. 1. Critiquing the research article a. Title describes the article b. Abstract summarizes the article.
QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH ARTICLE CRITIQUE GUIDELINES Instructions: Please critique the research article of your choice by addressing the following questions. This project is worth 10 points, and point will be deducted from the total points.
research was cited to show correlations between each variable and finding employment. I noticed, however, that the authors cited research that studied youths with disabilities, secondary school students, and university graduates, but I wondered if more research that related specifically to students with visual impairments could have been cited.
Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 1: quantitative research Abstract ). A critique is an impersonal evaluation of the strengths and limitations of the research being reviewed and should not be seen as a disparagement of the researchers ability.
Neither should it be regarded as. Step'by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 1: quantitative research Michaei Coughian, Patricia Cronin, Frances Ryan Abstract When caring for patients it is essential that nurses are using the current best practice.
To determine what this is, nurses must be able advanced reviewers to critique research studies (Tanner, ). These tools.Download