A comparison of the history by two opposing sides

While adoption is an option some women chose, many women do not want to suffer the physical and emotional trauma of pregnancy and labor only to give up a child. Therefore, laws should be passed to outlaw abortion. The argument is a balanced one; for every point supporting abortion there is a counter-point condemning abortion.

However, there are many groups who are lobbying Congress to pass laws that would make abortion illegal. Abortion is not murder since the fetus is not yet fully human, therefore, it is not in defiance against God.

We have used the same information and line of reasoning in this essay, however, this one will be presented in the "Point-by-Point" style argument. Block-by-Block Abortion is an example of a very controversial issue.

A fetus is the beginning of life. Pro-life supporters, on the other hand, believe that the unborn child has the right to life, and that abortion unlawfully takes away that right.

You are generally not expected to reach a conclusion, but simply to present the opposing sides of the argument. However, pro-choice defenders argue that abortion is not murder since the fetus is not yet a fully formed human.

Explains pro-life Abortion is an abomination, argues the pro-life activist. Pro-life and Pro-choice Supporters of both pro-life and pro-choice refer to religion as support for their side of the argument.

The Point-by-Point style argument presents both sides of the argument at the same time. Both sides present strong, logical arguments. First, you would present one point on a specific topic, then you would follow that up with the opposing point on the same topic.

Or, if we keep abortion legal, are we devaluing human life? Again, you are generally not expected to draw any conclusions, simply to fairly present both sides of the argument. In this style of writing, first you present all the arguments surrounding one side of the issue, then you present all the arguments surrounding the other side of the issue.

There is no easy answer to these questions.Opposing Viewpoints of Capital Punishment - “Death penalty is a deterrent,” by George E. Pataki and “The Death Penalty Should Not Be Abolished,” by David B.

Muhlhausen are two articles that support capital punishment as a deterrent of crime. The First World War (WWI) was fought from to and the Second World War (or WWII) was fought from to They were the largest military conflicts in human history.

Both wars involved military alliances between different groups of countries.

Paper Topics and Opposing Viewpoints: Home

World War I (a.k.a the First World War, the. how did the opposing sides of the revolutionary war compare with each other? what disadvantages dd british troops have when fighting the colonial militia?

better organazation, weapons. strong backing. Opposing Arguments: Abortion Introduction: Why abortion is immoral by Don Marquis is the start of two discussions pertaining to whether abortion should be acceptable in our modern society.

The argument, Marquis makes, is that abortion actually deprives the fetus’s “future-like-ours.”. to set against in some relation, especially as to demonstrate a comparison or contrast: to oppose advantages to disadvantages.

to use or take as being opposite or contrary. to set (something) over against something else in place, or to set (two things) so as to face or be opposite to one another. Links to various topics.

University Library California State University, Long Beach Bellflower Boulevard, Long Beach, California

Comparison/Contrast Essays: Two Patterns Download
A comparison of the history by two opposing sides
Rated 3/5 based on 22 review